<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
>

<channel>
	<title>SecuraBit &#187; information</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.securabit.com/tag/information/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.securabit.com</link>
	<description>SecuraBit Before It Bytes!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 04:33:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
<!-- podcast_generator="Blubrry PowerPress/1.0.9" mode="advanced" entry="normal" -->
	<itunes:summary>This is a Computer Security podcast brought to you by the guys at SecuraBit.com.  Please visit our web site at http://www.securabit.com or send questions/comments to feedback@securabit.com

Thanks for listening!</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:author>SecuraBit</itunes:author>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://staging.securabit.com/itunessecurabit.jpg" />
	<itunes:owner>
		<itunes:name>SecuraBit</itunes:name>
		<itunes:email>feedback@securabit.com</itunes:email>
	</itunes:owner>
	<managingEditor>feedback@securabit.com (SecuraBit)</managingEditor>
	<copyright>SecuraBit LLC</copyright>
	<itunes:subtitle>SecuraBit Before It Bytes!</itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:keywords>security, forensics, hacking, infosec, securabit, podcast, sans, drinking, beer</itunes:keywords>
	
	<itunes:category text="Technology">
		<itunes:category text="Tech News" />
		<itunes:category text="Software How-To" />
	</itunes:category>
		<item>
		<title>Rootkit Analysis: Hiding SSDT hooks</title>
		<link>http://www.securabit.com/2010/03/31/rootkit-analysis-hiding-ssdt-hooks/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rootkit-analysis-hiding-ssdt-hooks</link>
		<comments>http://www.securabit.com/2010/03/31/rootkit-analysis-hiding-ssdt-hooks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 13:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nickj</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Guest Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[announcements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forensics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poor security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vulnerability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securabit.com/?p=1360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In attempt to bring our readers/listeners more technical content, the SecuraBit team has brought on a guest blogger to cover some of the current issues facing malware analysts/reverse engineers.  Nick Jogie&#8217;s first post delves into rootkit analysis and explains in great detail how to detect such when AV and perimeter security devices just aren&#8217;t enough.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In attempt to bring our readers/listeners more technical content, the SecuraBit team has brought on a guest blogger to cover some of the current issues facing malware analysts/reverse engineers.  Nick Jogie&#8217;s first post delves into rootkit analysis and explains in great detail how to detect such when AV and perimeter security devices just aren&#8217;t enough.  Provide feedback to the SecuraBit team and let us know your thoughts!</p>
<p>&#8220;System Service Descriptor Table (SSDT) patching has been widely used by rootkits and is usually easily detected.  BlackEnergy version 2 has implemented a technique which successfully hides from basic rootkit detection.  Basic rootkit detectors typically only check address ranges, on function pointers, listed in the SSDT.  If the pointers are outside the kernel address range, it implies that the SSDT is hooked.</p>
<p>The following will illustrate a procedural check, used to uncover this technique, using a kernel debugger&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Read more here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.securabit.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Rootkit-Analysis-Hiding-SSDT-Hooks1.pdf">Rootkit Analysis &#8211; Hiding SSDT Hooks</a></p>
<p>Written by: Nick Jogie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securabit.com/2010/03/31/rootkit-analysis-hiding-ssdt-hooks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Escaping the clutches of The GOOG</title>
		<link>http://www.securabit.com/2010/01/21/escaping-the-clutches-of-the-goog/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=escaping-the-clutches-of-the-goog</link>
		<comments>http://www.securabit.com/2010/01/21/escaping-the-clutches-of-the-goog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 19:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moxie Marlinspike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proxy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securabit.com/?p=1187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We live in a world where everything and anything is just a click or web search away. Instant access to information is the new norm and seemingly taken for granted.  When questions need answering, most “Just Google it.”; with that ease and convenience of using The GOOG though, comes a price…Your privacy. Enter GoogleSharing. On [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We live in a world where everything and anything is just a click or web search away. Instant access to information is the new norm and seemingly taken for granted.  When questions need answering, most “Just Google it.”; with that ease and convenience of using The GOOG though, comes a price…Your privacy.</p>
<p>Enter <a href="http://googlesharing.net/">GoogleSharing.</a></p>
<p>On Tuesday, <a href="http://www.thoughtcrime.org/">Moxie Marlinspike</a> released a small lightweight Firefox extension that is aimed to prevent the collection of users search/behavioral data by Google. GoogleSharing works by serving all of your queries through a custom proxy that contains a collection of what Moxie calls “GoogleSharing Identities”.  When enabled, if the Firefox plug-in detects a request sent out to any of Google’s services, it routes you through the proxy, removes any identification information and then replaces that data with one of the random, pooled Google Sharing Identities.  Pretty slick!  Obviously, if you are already logged into any of Google’s many services (Gmail, iGoogle, Groups etc) GoogleSharing won’t help one bit.</p>
<p>While anonymous proxies are nothing new, GoogleSharing introduces a different method of anonymity for a pretty specific threat. With its lean and quick Firefox extension, GoogleSharing is a step in the right direction of trying to regain some sort of privacy back on the net.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securabit.com/2010/01/21/escaping-the-clutches-of-the-goog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hacking China Gone Wild</title>
		<link>http://www.securabit.com/2010/01/13/hacking-china-gone-wild/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=hacking-china-gone-wild</link>
		<comments>http://www.securabit.com/2010/01/13/hacking-china-gone-wild/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 15:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyber Attacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securabit.com/?p=1110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The People’s Republic of China sure has been busy making it into the headlines the past few days… Early Tuesday morning, China’s premier internet search engine Baidu, was attacked by the group calling themselves the Iranian Cyber Army. The DoS attack which took place over the night rendered the search giant&#8217;s website unavailable throughout most [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The People’s Republic of China sure has been busy making it into the headlines the past few days…</p>
<p>Early Tuesday morning, China’s premier internet search engine Baidu, was attacked by the group calling themselves the Iranian Cyber Army. The DoS attack which took place over the night rendered the search giant&#8217;s website unavailable throughout most of the morning with one Taiwanese version of the site still recovering. The attack vector used on Baidu seems to be the same <a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/12/twitter-hacked-redirected/">‘internal credentials’</a> method in which the Iranian Cyber Army used against Twitter just last month.</p>
<p>With this type of DNS attack seeming to be all the rage these days; it didn’t take long for Chinese hackers to slap back with a message of their own. Within hours of Baidu going down, at least two Iranian website have been compromised with more said to be on the way. This isn’t the last we’ll hear of this intercontinental cyber-street-fight…</p>
<p>Stealing the headlines late yesterday though was the news that Google.cn was attacked as part of a large scale sophisticated attack on their infrastructure. According to Tuesday evening’s <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/new-approach-to-china.html">blog post</a>, the mid-December attack targeted various Gmail accounts of Chinese human rights activists. The attackers however, were not able to gain total access into the email accounts; they only obtained bits of information from the subject line of the emails. As a form of retaliation, Google has since stopped censoring search results in China and threatened to pull out of the country all together.</p>
<p>While the details of this story are slow to unfold, it is looking more and more like a high profile corporate espionage operation organized or maybe even sponsored by Chinese government. A statement from Leslie Harris, president and CEO of the Center for Democracy and Technology seems to echo that fact: &#8220;They wouldn&#8217;t be taking an action suggesting that they cannot operate in China &#8230; if it was not related to the Chinese government,&#8221; she said.</p>
<p>Based on recent posts by <a href="http://blogs.adobe.com/conversations/2010/01/adobe_investigates_corporate_n.html">Adobe</a> and now news that Yahoo may have been targeted as well, a <a href="http://www.state.gov/secretary/rm/2010/01/135105.htm">statement</a> issued by the US government is letting China know that they are taking these allegations very seriously. It will be interesting to see what comes of all this as more details are emerging by the minute.</p>
<p>Blog post by:  Sean Hausauer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securabit.com/2010/01/13/hacking-china-gone-wild/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet taxes, Pro RIAA, anti-encryption? Say hello to Obama&#8217;s VP</title>
		<link>http://www.securabit.com/2008/08/25/internet-taxes-pro-riaa-anti-encryption-say-hello-to-obamas-vp/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=internet-taxes-pro-riaa-anti-encryption-say-hello-to-obamas-vp</link>
		<comments>http://www.securabit.com/2008/08/25/internet-taxes-pro-riaa-anti-encryption-say-hello-to-obamas-vp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 12:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[riaa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securabit.com/?p=217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Politics is by no means our idea of entertainment when it comes to our blogs, however to see such a strong candidate pick a "technological bi-polar" candidate as the potential VP, it makes you wonder]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Politics is by no means our idea of entertainment when it comes to our blogs, however to see such a strong candidate pick a &#8220;technological bi-polar&#8221; candidate as the potential VP, it makes you wonder if McCain is already a winner.<br />
<cr><br />
Joe Biden was picked as Obama&#8217;s VP candidate if they are to take the White House this upcoming election.  Apparently his views towards net neutrality, the RIAA, and anti-encryption are a little skewed over the past few years.  I&#8217;m sure the EFF doesn&#8217;t think too highly of him either.  Although he may have experience in foreign policy, how does that protect our rights here in the U.S. as he was a key player when it came to the Patriot Act amongst many other laws that passed through the Senate.  Follow the links below to make your own assumption of our potential Vice President.</p>
<p><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/cnet/20080824/tc_cnet/83011357831002416338">Yahoo News</a></p>
<p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5041044/vp-candidate-biden-is-no-friend-to-file-sharing-n">Gizmodo write-up</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securabit.com/2008/08/25/internet-taxes-pro-riaa-anti-encryption-say-hello-to-obamas-vp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet taxes, Pro RIAA, anti-encryption? Say hello to Obama&#039;s VP</title>
		<link>http://www.securabit.com/2008/08/25/internet-taxes-pro-riaa-anti-encryption-say-hello-to-obamas-vp-2/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=internet-taxes-pro-riaa-anti-encryption-say-hello-to-obamas-vp-2</link>
		<comments>http://www.securabit.com/2008/08/25/internet-taxes-pro-riaa-anti-encryption-say-hello-to-obamas-vp-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 12:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[riaa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securabit.com/?p=217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Politics is by no means our idea of entertainment when it comes to our blogs, however to see such a strong candidate pick a "technological bi-polar" candidate as the potential VP, it makes you wonder]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Politics is by no means our idea of entertainment when it comes to our blogs, however to see such a strong candidate pick a &#8220;technological bi-polar&#8221; candidate as the potential VP, it makes you wonder if McCain is already a winner.<br />
<cr><br />
Joe Biden was picked as Obama&#8217;s VP candidate if they are to take the White House this upcoming election.  Apparently his views towards net neutrality, the RIAA, and anti-encryption are a little skewed over the past few years.  I&#8217;m sure the EFF doesn&#8217;t think too highly of him either.  Although he may have experience in foreign policy, how does that protect our rights here in the U.S. as he was a key player when it came to the Patriot Act amongst many other laws that passed through the Senate.  Follow the links below to make your own assumption of our potential Vice President.</p>
<p><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/cnet/20080824/tc_cnet/83011357831002416338">Yahoo News</a></p>
<p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5041044/vp-candidate-biden-is-no-friend-to-file-sharing-n">Gizmodo write-up</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securabit.com/2008/08/25/internet-taxes-pro-riaa-anti-encryption-say-hello-to-obamas-vp-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Latest tools from Defcon 16</title>
		<link>http://www.securabit.com/2008/08/22/latest-tools-from-defcon-16/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=latest-tools-from-defcon-16</link>
		<comments>http://www.securabit.com/2008/08/22/latest-tools-from-defcon-16/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 00:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backtrack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cracker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ddos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defcon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forensics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[haxor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[l33t]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[password cracker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcasters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poor security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rainbow tables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[testing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securabit.com/?p=202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to Mubix for his posting on <a href="http://www.zdnet.com">ZDNet</a>, below you will find a link that describes all of the latest tools that were presented at Defcon 16.  Use them at your own discretion and]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to Mubix for his posting on <a href="http://www.zdnet.com">ZDNet</a>, below you will find a link that describes all of the latest tools that were presented at Defcon 16.  Use them at your own discretion and make sure you have permission if using them on an enterprise network!  As Mubix has no control over the ZDnet posting, you can visit his <a href="http://www.room362.com/">site</a> and keep up-to-date on the latest happenings.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=1735">Latest tools from DC16!</a></p>
<p>And if Jay Beale is reading this, we want <a href="http://www.intelguardians.com/themiddler.html">Middler</a> to come out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securabit.com/2008/08/22/latest-tools-from-defcon-16/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Free online viewable magazines?!</title>
		<link>http://www.securabit.com/2008/08/21/free-online-viewable-magazines/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=free-online-viewable-magazines</link>
		<comments>http://www.securabit.com/2008/08/21/free-online-viewable-magazines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 16:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[announcements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cracker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[haxor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[l33t]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securabit.com/?p=197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We are going to approach this subject very lightly as I'm sure it's clearly copyright infringement, however <a href="http://www.lifehacker.com">Lifehacker</a> has a great post for a website called Mygazines. (which we won't link to for legal]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are going to approach this subject very lightly as I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s clearly copyright infringement, however <a href="http://www.lifehacker.com">Lifehacker</a> has a great post for a website called Mygazines. (which we won&#8217;t link to for legal purposes)  Basically it&#8217;s a repository of scanned magazines encompassing just about anything and everything your heart desires, minus the pr0n.  Click the link below to be redirected to Lifehacker&#8217;s site to read the full article and read free magazines if you so choose to <img src='http://www.securabit.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><a href="http://lifehacker.com/400564/mygazines-offers-full-magazine-scans-online">Free Mags via Lifehacker!</a></p>
<p>Weird, I could of sworn I heard someone say free 2600 mags <img src='http://www.securabit.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>**By no means do we here at SecuraBit encourage engaging in unlawful activity however there are some free magazines on this site as well that could come in handy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securabit.com/2008/08/21/free-online-viewable-magazines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Air Force Cyber Command halted&#8230;?</title>
		<link>http://www.securabit.com/2008/08/18/air-force-cyber-command-halted/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=air-force-cyber-command-halted</link>
		<comments>http://www.securabit.com/2008/08/18/air-force-cyber-command-halted/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 12:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[problems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securabit.com/?p=183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So the Air Force, which prides themselves for being the most technical branch of all the armed forces, has decided to suspend its efforts on building their latest <a href="http://www.afcyber.af.mil/">Cyber Command</a>.  Not sure if]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the Air Force, which prides themselves for being the most technical branch of all the armed forces, has decided to suspend its efforts on building their latest <a href="http://www.afcyber.af.mil/">Cyber Command</a>.  Not sure if any of you recall the latest AF recruitment commercials geared around cyber security, but it would be safe to say that those will not be airing until the Air Force works out some kinks.</p>
<p><span class="body"> &#8220;The Secretary and Chief of Staff of the Air Force have considered delaying currently planned actions on Air Force Cyber Command to allow ample time for a comprehensive assessment of all AFCYBER requirements and to synchronize the AFCYBER mission with other key Air Force initiatives,&#8221; the service said in <a href="http://www.afcyber.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123110806" target="_blank">a statement</a> released Thursday.</span></p>
<p>Makes you wonder why ample time wasn&#8217;t dedicated in the first place for a &#8220;comprehensive assessment.&#8221;</p>
<p>Read the full article <a href="http://www.securityfocus.com/brief/799">here</a> compliments of <a href="http://www.securityfocus.com">Security Focus</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securabit.com/2008/08/18/air-force-cyber-command-halted/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If you thought you were a 1337 h4x0r&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.securabit.com/2008/08/06/if-you-thought-you-were-a-1337-hx0r/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=if-you-thought-you-were-a-1337-hx0r</link>
		<comments>http://www.securabit.com/2008/08/06/if-you-thought-you-were-a-1337-hx0r/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 12:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cracker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defcon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poor security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Show Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upcoming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securabit.com/?p=150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In case you don't have a television, radio, or even the Internet, which means you wouldn't be reading this.  One of the greatest <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/05/AR2008080501859.html">cyber crimes</a> of all time has finally come to a halt]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case you don&#8217;t have a television, radio, or even the Internet, which means you wouldn&#8217;t be reading this.  One of the greatest <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/05/AR2008080501859.html">cyber crimes</a> of all time has finally come to a halt, or so they think&#8230;</p>
<p>Eleven people in the US city of Boston have been charged with credit card fraud.  The US authorities say the suspects stole the data from more than 40 million  credit cards.</p>
<p>The hackers obtained the information by installing software  in computers and databases of banks and major store chains. They also drove  through residential districts with a laptop to hack into personal computers with  wireless connections.</p>
<p>Prosecutors speak of the biggest credit card  swindle in US history. The suspects, who have US, Estonian, Ukrainian, Belarus  and Chinese nationalities, allegedly embezzled tens of millions of dollars.</p>
<p>So while I&#8217;m sitting at DEFCON 16 enjoying a &#8220;free&#8221; bar tab, I wonder if I&#8217;ll see it show up my own credit card since I could quite possibly be funding one of these parties and not even know until it&#8217;s too late.  Oh well, that&#8217;s what the fraud department is for right&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securabit.com/2008/08/06/if-you-thought-you-were-a-1337-hx0r/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OpenPacket</title>
		<link>http://www.securabit.com/2008/07/25/openpacket/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=openpacket</link>
		<comments>http://www.securabit.com/2008/07/25/openpacket/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 16:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[databases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Show Releases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://securabit.com/?p=113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I came across these guys a month or so back when I was looking at topics for one of our shows, and I don't remember whether I touched on them or not, but this project]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I came across these guys a month or so back when I was looking at topics for one of our shows, and I don&#8217;t remember whether I touched on them or not, but this project is definitely worth a second look.  Their community seems small right now, but the idea behind what they&#8217;re doing seems like common sense to me, and I&#8217;m not aware of anyone else out there collecting packet captures from anyone who wants to upload one.</p>
<p>Obviously, be careful what you download, but if we can get some traffic their way and get people to upload both malicious and normal traffic captures to them, I think it will end up being an extremely useful resource for anyone who uses packet data for their job, such as writing snort signatures!</p>
<p>Their site is <a title="OpenPacket" href="https://www.openpacket.org">https://www.openpacket.org</a>.  Remember that this isn&#8217;t for uploading 10 gigs of traffic you captured off of your neighbor&#8217;s wifi, and don&#8217;t submit your own traffic that includes your paypal and online banking sessions either. <img src='http://www.securabit.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   Make sure you have permission if you&#8217;re going to be submitting a capture with information someone other than you generated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securabit.com/2008/07/25/openpacket/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
